(no subject)

[norian]

"Code size is important, because the time it takes to write a program depends mostly on its length. If your program would be three times as long in another language, it will take three times as long to write"

http://www.paulgraham.com/icad.html

Comments

[norian.livejournal.com]

Code size is important, because the time it takes to write a program depends mostly on its length. If your program would be three times as long in another language, it will take three times as long to write-- and you can't get around this by hiring more people, because beyond a certain size new hires are actually a net lose. Fred Brooks described this phenomenon in his famous book The Mythical Man-Month, and everything I've seen has tended to confirm what he said.

So how much shorter are your programs if you write them in Lisp? Most of the numbers I've heard for Lisp versus C, for example, have been around 7-10x. But a recent article about ITA in New Architect magazine said that "one line of Lisp can replace 20 lines of C," and since this article was full of quotes from ITA's president, I assume they got this number from ITA. If so then we can put some faith in it; ITA's software includes a lot of C and C++ as well as Lisp, so they are speaking from experience.

:o))

[norian.livejournal.com]

у меня есть подозрение, что аффтар для девелопмента пользовался в-основном перфокартами, и просто не в курсе волшебных кнопок ^C ^V и не слышал такое слово как бангалор

это не есть плохо само по себе, просто немного устарело ..